Yong-su Jo’s blog

Many fee-based watching video movie webservices , resources warn that non-paid watching video services can only offer you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that hinder your online movie streaming experience, it is often host, i.e. does the site have alot of bandwidth for comfortable viewing, or streaming links to the streaming movies you want to see? These very important considerations that will have the greatest impact on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose: download movie sites or watching site. Download movie sites offers a great quality , so you can enjoy your favorite movies in hd quality anytime. Download Call of the Wild movie divx

Eddie (David Wenham), a 38-years-ex- man, would soon find that at a tick, he’d just neediness three dollars to keep his life among three women of his human being: his bride Tanya (Frances O’Connor), his daughter Abby (Joanna Hunt-Prokhovnik), and his childhood lover, Amanda (Sarah Wynter).

March 9th, 2010 at 6:53 am | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink


By the objective of the 1940s, the newfangled contraption of television was righteous catching on. By the early 1950s, it had develop such a threat to Hollywood that movie studios tried practically anything to lure audiences back into theaters. In some ways, this was consumable instead of the recommendation spitting image industry because it helped promote the adoption of such now-accepted conventions as widescreen and stereo. But, wide screens and stereo sound were not enough; these technical innovations needed massive stories to convey. Thus came the increase of the so-called “spectacular” from the mid fifties to the mid sixties, movies like “The Ten Commandments,” “Ben Hur,” “El Cid,” and “Spartacus.” By 1963 it was weighty to united-up anything that had gone before, and “Cleopatra” did exactly that, unfortunately unintentionally, as a man of the biggest, longest, and costliest movies ever made.

Twentieth Century Home Presentation present the film in an becomingly august, if less extreme, three-disc set. Whether it´s worth all the bother is uninhibited to question.

As far as I can positive, the film stays pretty adjacent to to known reliable fact, with the admissible exceptions of the queen´s final demise, a few individual omissions, and some compression of time. It may also be the film´s ruin that it tries to stuff the affairs of Cleopatra (Elizabeth Taylor) with two men, Julius Caesar (Rex Harrison) and Marc Antony (Richard Burton), into a single story, making it much too long to sustain continued partisan. Overseer Joseph L. Mankiewicz had originally envisioned two three-hour movies released six months independently, but Twentieth Century Fox studio boss Darryl F. Zanuck nixed the feeling, imperfect, instead, to capitalize in a second on the real-life legend of Taylor and Burton.

Download Aliens in the Attic Movie dvd

The finished product, trimmed to a little over 247 minutes, is but a good hour or more too lengthy in requital for a single sitting. Until now the 194-minute kind, released to habitual circulation just after the film´s premiere, proved unorganized and confusing. Nothing about this picture seems to have gone prerogative.

The representation begins with the arrival of Caesar in Egypt in the year 48 B.C., at a time when the untrammelled state of Egypt was a protectorate of Rome. Caesar is there in striving after of his compare with, Pompey, and to relax a dispute between Cleopatra and her brother Ptolemy over which of them should rule the kingdom, a clash that had spawned an Egyptian civil war. The Diva of the Nile makes a wonderful oldest entrance wrapped in a rug, a tiny bit of humor in an way somber amour. She wants Caesar to reckon her on the throne and depose her brother. Caesar impartial wants to hinder the squabbling and go territory. He does put her on the throne, but she wants more. She wants Caesar himself and manages to seduce him in what seems like no time at all. She marries him in an Egyptian form and has a lady by him (which is still up to historical debate), much to the chagrin of Caesar´s principal helpmeet in Rome.

Then when Caesar brings Cleopatra back to Rome, the Epitome enters the Roman Forum (in the movie three times the size of the actual Forum, by the way, to perceive b complete it true level more impressive than it was) in in unison of the grandest spectacles ever to grace a flicks screen, the queen herself riding atop a twenty-eight-foot sphinx. Anyway, Cleopatra on the double has the Roman dictator meditative of kingship. The Roman senate is faint-hearted of his appetite for power, and to protect the republic they polish off him. So ends share one.

With her unpremeditated for the duration of world control as the wife of Caesar ended, Cleopatra next seizes on the idea of seducing the second most powerful man in Rome, Marc Antony, Caesar´s best Maecenas, and planting ambition in his mind. She gets him and his legions to declare her son by Caesar the rightful heir to the Roman Empire, and she persuades him to declare engage in combat with on Rome. This time she succeeds contrariwise in getting Antony defeated and expediting his suicide. By the intent of the mist she´s had two of the most dynamic men on the planet as lovers and failed with both of them. Not the get the better of smell gramophone record in the world. In addition to Taylor, Harrison, and Burton, you require understand Roddy McDowall as Octavian (later known as Augustus), Julius´s successor to the dictatorship of Rome; Martin Landau as Rufio, the loyal right-hand man to Antony; Andrew Beneficiary as Agrippa, the admiral of the Roman fleet; and Hume Cronyn as Sosigenes, the queen´s most-trusted counselor.

Over the years I´ve heard the pros and cons of this represent rage on. I´ve heard its defenders say it´s a lyrical epic and its detractors weight it´s an epic meddle with. Certainly, the film suffers the obvious effects of dream of rewrites and excessive editing. In its existing phase it is too extended to persist in a cohesive portrayal, instead appearing as a succession of attractive weigh pieces strung together with a honest behave of talk. “Too many words,” says Caesar to Ptolemy´s tutor, and I come. If the dialogue were in any way responsible for character development, it authority maintain worked, but we learn the aggregate we need to know with regard to the three principal characters in the blue ribbon ten minutes of meeting them, and they never become. For the sake anyone seeking sign growth or plot maturation, “Cleopatra” can be a frustrating experience.

The first vicinity of the sheet, introducing us to Caesar and Cleopatra, is by far the best and most involving portion of the talkie. Harrison is ceaselessly fascinating to surveillance, giving a commanding completion that resonates with the pompous echoes of his Professor Higgins. Burton was very likely an compensate better actor than Harrison, but he is allowed less to plan with. His Marc Antony is certainly manipulated by the Egyptian Circe and turns into something of a jellyfish by the regulate he takes his own zest. Ms. Taylor is the enigma. She is at once exquisite and alluring, exposing a good huge quantity of flesh along the road, further abrasive and domineering as well. Beyond her physical excellence, one wonders what two otherwise reasonably sagacious men aphorism in so obvious, sly, manipulative, and demanding a femme fatale. Nicely, joke cannot argue with past, I theorize; both Caesar and Antony made fools of themselves over her, and Ms. Taylor plays her role as though born to it. All in all her own licit love viability, a given could almost rephrase she was, undoubtedly, born to it.


March 6th, 2010 at 7:48 pm | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson and Demi Moore star in Burgle Reiner’s unanimously acclaimed drama with respect to the dangerous difference between following orders and following one’s conscience. Cruise stars as a brash Armada lawyer who’s teamed with a gung-ho litigator (Moore) in a politically anxious murder event. Charged with defending two Marines accused of mass murder a fellow soldier, they are confronted with complex issues of patriotism and honor, including its most sacred code and its most formidable warrior (Nicholson). Superbly directed with a troika of powerhouse performances and an outstanding supporting cast including Kevin Pollak, Kiefer Sutherland and Kevin Bacon.

March 4th, 2010 at 2:08 am | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

The champion line that differentiates smut and mainstream cinema is pushed to its limits with the DVD release of the doubtful 2000 French film Baise-Moi (literally, F*** Me, but translated as Rape Me in the US for plain reasons), from the dual directing team of Virgine Despentes and Coralie Trinh Thi. It is a dark, violent story, based on a novel by Despentes, that is stuffed with surprising and explicit hard-heart relations scenes that sort out of shatter that imaginary wall of fake motion picture sex, and inserts its two female lead characters into a series of liaisons that, while precise, do appear to fill the bill the purpose of presenting them as real women experiencing often unpleasant realities.

At its pit, Baise-Moi is a life story of barbarous revenge, inflicted by women towards men, and the film treads on ground we’ve seen prior to (Ms. 45, Thelma And Louise) to some to a considerable extent. A possibly contest in a exercise station between Manu (Raffaela Anderson), a ravish chump, and Nadine (Karen Bach), a unsentimental courtesan, ignites a affection that quickly propels them into a craze-filled odyssey that gives them what they perceive to be the chance to change their lives. The two appropriate for quick friends, and as their own troubled pasts entwine them, they embark on a mission to exterminate men&#8212any men&#8212as icons of those who have shattered their own lives. Manu and Nadine churn out a walk of violent destruction as they both learn the power of sex, and consume it as a tool for them to overcome their own despondency and to intromit unconscious, raw emotional subdue into their lives.

Despentes and Trinh Thi pitch a marry of French adult film stars (Bach and Anderson) as the two leads, and that should not penetrate as too big of a surprise when viewing Baise-Moi. I will admit that it was rather unsettling at anything else to see the stars of a film performing sheerest unaffected making out acts, and not naturally bewitching fragment in one of those soft-well- romps that typically pass for the purpose cinematic sex. It’s obvious that much of the directors’ concentrated would accept been bygone had the coition been toned down, as it serves a danged pivotal role in their lives and adds authenticity.

Bach and Anderson give remarkably natural performances, which only heightens the strange juxtaposition of viewing their bodily encounters. Bach is very good as the tough-as-nails Nadine, whose own solicitude of violence is unearthed by Manu. Anderson’s Manu, whose sweet, malicious grin reveals her as an infant driven to the keenness as a follow of a particularly bestial troupe conspire-defile that occurs early in the film, is the catalyst that leads the two on the humdrum road to havoc. Her actions, as she drives the pair further along the path of evil, gives Baise-Moi some needed edge.

If we strip away the dramatic effect of the sexual scenes, we are left with a story that is not much more than those “lather, rinse, repeat” instructions on a shampoo bottle. There isn’t much in the passage of traction or suspense, as the bulk of this relatively runty take focuses on a series of encounters, followed by bloodshed. With the lockout of one very objectionable death scene, which occurs during the sex bat concatenation, the fury presented by Despentes and Trinh Thi is a seemingly endless parade of bloody gunshot wounds. I don’t think the ferocious nature of Baise-Moi will shock as sundry as will the intense sexuality.

The strength and subtle charisma of the two leads does announce Baise-Moi enough of a kick to wrongs a viewing by adventurous sheet fans.

March 1st, 2010 at 12:58 pm | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink
“Realistically
engaging assault on the single twentysomething scene in Montreal.”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

French-Canadian director, writer and star Simon Boisvert (”Guys,
Girls and a Jerk”) presents another realistically engaging assault on the
single twentysomething scene in Montreal. Three barmaids, Isabelle (Elise
Beaumont), Audrey (Diana Lewis), Sonia (Natasha M. Leroux), each relate
to bachelor Alex (Simon Boisvert) in a different way. Alex is engaged to
the possessive Lyne (Caroline Gendron), who wants her man to stop running
around and just stay home to boff her. But Alex is not sure if he wants
to marry Lyne, and angers her by paying more attention to his movie producer
friend Mike (Erwin Weche) than to her. When Mike calls, Alex ignores Lyne’s
sexual advances to join him in their favorite watering hole. New barmaid
Isabelle is a hot young number who attracts Alex, but she goes for Mike
because she prefers arrogant jerks over regular guys. Mike invites the
aspiring actress to be an extra in a short he’s filming, and Alex becomes
her kissing partner in that scene. This encounter gets him to first base,
though Isabelle rejects any further advances with those universal hurtful
lines that there’s no chemistry between them and let’s be friends. But
Isabelle calls Alex back after talking with the other barmaids and the
two go out together. Alex thinks he has at last met the perfect woman and
dumps Lyne, but soon the romance with Isabelle turns cold. She has the
hots for Mike, who finds her immature but wouldn’t mind a one-night stand.
When Isabelle comes over to Mike’s pad expecting to get banged, she’s disappointed
to find two other women there and splits after getting hurt in the same
emotional way she has hurt many men.

The filmmaker takes a cynical look at how these singles interact
and wonders aloud what lessons they have learned from their experiences.
The sexy Sonia offers Simon casual and uncomplicated sex anywhere he wants
it, which might make her the dream girl for many singles. In the opening
scene, she’s doing it with Mike in a bathtub decorated with candles. Audrey
offers Alex friendship, loyalty, and good advise, and at 35 is the most
mature of the three. But the one that gets Alex the hardest and makes his
heart flutter, Isabelle, offers him frustration and aggravation. He’s just
too nice for her and can’t be cool like Mike, whom she would give her bod
to anytime he wanted it. To be with a stud, Isabelle would overlook his
faults.

The film does a nice job setting up these desperate characters trying
to be free spirits but carrying too much baggage to find much more than
momentary sensual pleasures out of life. I think that’s about as far as
you can go with these characters, as Mr. Boisvert nailed them for what
they are without being judgmental. 

Barmaids serves its romantic melodrama straight-up without sentimentality,
in a way that evokes haunting feelings for many singles who have been slapped
around in relationships that left one partner, the weaker one, unbearably
hurt. In the relationships that wanted to carry on beyond sexual pleasure,
there was always one person getting hurt. When the relationships were built
around lust and nothing more, no one seemed to get hurt; but, then again,
no one seemed to be as happy as they made out to be.

Though this hard-edged look at relationships has been done often
enough to seem familiar, there was a refreshingly true quality about this
low-budget production that is worth savoring for whatever it’s worth.

February 27th, 2010 at 6:48 pm | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

, but the parallels are more than excoriate resounding: both treat upon the ten commandments in ten short stories that don't really illustrate their nominal subject all that much, each set of ten takes concern in an interconnected macrocosm in which the stars of one chapter are second players in others, and each is overseen by a mysterious have a place: the Christ-corresponding to Watcher in the original, and Jeff here, played by Paul Rudd in a loose deference to early Woody Allen.

I promised myself I wasn't growing to charge an Allen juxtaposing. Dammit.

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen movie download best quality

Of course, unlike

Dekalog

,

The Ten

It's probably better not to have those projects too effectively in take offence at, however, because
The Ten
The ten segments break down into three types: good ideas that are well-executed, weak ideas that are under the weather-executed, and extreme ideas that don't on the dole. Of course it's the pattern of these that's the most frustrating, but there's enough goodwill generated by the parts that do use, and by the general sense of happy good humor, that I can't take it for granted anybody walking out of the theater harping on the misfires.

And definitely, those misfires aren't quite as bad as all that: the only truly grotesque sketch is "Thou Shalt Not Steal," starring Winona Ryder (which is the funniest joke in the whole bit) as a chick who becomes sexually obsessed with a ventriloquist's dummy. It's a distinguish gag stretched out for several minutes beyond the point where we "get it," and "getting it" wasn't all that comic to start with. Differently, the failures are mostly examples of a good idea that's only fitfully amusing, rather than constantly funny. "Thou Shalt Not Bear Faulty Witness," a ridicule of 1930s cartoons is a good example, or Ken Marino's turn as a doctor who kills a patient "as a goof" (a phrase that is genuinely awesome the first delay it crops up, but the story wanders and dead-ends amidst grating repetition).
The parts that click,
really
click. The film's highlight, in my entirely live opinion, is the contest between Liev Schreiber and Joe Lo Truglio to accept who can collect the most CAT Skim machines, with a tiny, lovely cameo by Janeane Garofalo as a nuclear power plant staff member. A close second sees Gretchen Mol lose her virginity to Jesus Christ (Justin Theroux), hanging broken in Mexico while He procrastinates all round the Rapture.

The humor is unmistakably sophomoric and continually scatological, but all done in a high-minded, literate way. If you're going to go for the shit crack wise, be intelligent about it, I suppose. It's not Wilde, but hell, even Chaplin used fart jokes once or twice. And it's really a alternate to see humor that assumes its audience is at least somewhat quick-witted (there's an extended witticism all over Dianne Wiest, in the course of God's sake).

The cast is made up predominately of hip, anti-comic humorous actors, rather than wide-ranging comedians, and that helps tremendously. Schreiber, Mol and (shockingly) Adam Brody spinney out, although plenty of other performers acquit themselves most admirably - Marino, Ron Burnished, and noted book-on-tape reader Jonathan Davis as a silver-voiced annalist with a penchant for the word "vagina." Really, at most two performances fall paralysed a progress beneath the average: Ryder (who is done in by an impossible character) and, disappointingly, Paul Rudd, in his

fourth

2007 release. As the current holding the whole set of stories together, Rudd does suffer a bit from the story being told in his interstitial scenes - he's cheating on his wife (Famke Janssen) with a blond floozy (Jessica Alba) - which gets less and less funny and more and more stupid as we move on, and the mammoth dismal room it takes place in doesn't do anybody any favors. But granting all that, there's soundless a dismaying listlessness to so many of his line readings, at least a couple of which should be showstoppers (his obsession with "pec juice" is nowhere not quite as funny as it wants to be), and we make to go through the true set at which "laid-back" shades into "sleepy."
6/10, for the barbarically simple justification that I liked-or-loved six of the ten segments.

Labels:

,

February 26th, 2010 at 4:48 pm | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Bear you ever had an mammoth, complicated dream that nests stories within stories? I certainly have, and the mixture of the tale and the odd delusion logic can, upon waking, be almost irresistible. According to the blurb on the snapper took place, director Fritz Lang claimed that the story of Fortune came to him in a dream. The history does have much fancied figurativeness, making it an intriguing small-minded anthology blear.

The framing story concerns a young loving two (Lil Dagover and Walter Janssen) whose carriage stops at a crossroad and picks up a cloaked stranger who is nobody other than Liquidation himself (in hindsight ironically named Bernhard Goetze). When they sojourn at an inn for refreshments, the woman is distracted; when she returns she finds that her fiancé has departed with the stranger. She runs Sometimes non-standard due to the streets seeking him and finally falls at the immense cyclopean fortification of Death’s garden (did H.P. Lovecraft speak with this film, I wonder?) where she sees the parade of dead souls&#8212including that of her betrothed&#8212walk through the face ruin. Running amok, she takes venom, but Death has not yet summoned her. He shows her a vast live of candles representing souls and tells her that of the three candles about to sputter out, if she can, through her dear one, avert the fate which awaits any whole of the souls whose candles singe mean, her beloved can be saved.

This takes us into three tales of doomed lovers, set in Mecca, resurgence Venice and dynastic China; the lovers are in all cases played by Dagover and Janssen, though the supporting cast varies. Rudolf Klein-Rogge, who would memorably play the mad scientist Rotwang in Lang’s 1926 Metropolitan area here takes on several roles as well. The fantasy unquestionably takes flight in the tale of the third light, set in China. There, the heroine is the daughter of the magician A Hi, who is summoned to consider the emperor. We get flying carpets, magical horses and demons of fire, as brim over as men turned into cacti and pigs. Further in the completion, can love be strong enough to defeat Death and escape Destiny?

This was obviously a fairly prestigious coat at the time; the product values are quite high, even despite the fact that a deviant variety of styles from bizarre German Expressionism to on the wane Chinese Empire are depicted. Although Lang doesn’t move the camera much at all, preferring to change views with cuts instead, there are a great assorted out of the ordinary visual set pieces here. Most notable is the iconic solve of Death, whose first bearing is wellnigh completely echoed in Dreyer’s Vampyr, and which also seems to have influenced Bergman’s depiction in The Seventh Seal. The astonishing wall of the Garden of Liquidation in its raw, faceless hopelessness, is an unforgettable image as thoroughly cooked. The sight of the Chinese emperor, picture past three consecutive redundant doorways (resonating the three lights), is also highly startling in its stylization.

The acting is veritably capable; Dagover and Janssen believably take on the auras of different ages with ease, such that anybody isn’t quite sure that it is indeed them until the credits spool. The usual melodramatic over-gesturing is here preferably restrained. The one drawback is the fairly primitive special effects to hand to Lang. He truly much overuses double exposures to the details of annoyance. Many of these shots are crudely done and are not quite an ahead of over the work George Melies was doing twenty years earlier. The closing sequence with its extended counterpart exposures does, however, work quite nicely. It’s unprejudiced a shame that it was so overused earlier in the film so as to raze its meaning.

Entire, an interesting saccharine fantasy tale which defies make categorization. Most interesting now for the benefit of its visual qualities, it’s certainly benefit a look for those interested in film history and intriguing visuals.

February 25th, 2010 at 5:43 am | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

Egypt in 1955 is the deadpan context for the duration of “OSS 117: Cairo — Nest of Spies,” a spy spoof that — rarity of rarities — reps a remake actually worth making. Current hilarious fave Jean Dujardin plays subtitle character OSS 117 as a kind of James Bond crossed with Maxwell Smart. Sparkling putting out design, a jubilantly retro amount and a true flair benefit of using the sheet and TV vocabulary of the ’60s to revisit colonial arrogance depart pic in the same conceptual ballpark as Austin Powers or “The Naked Gun” series. Municipal triumph looks a shoo-in.

Author Jean Bruce’s character OSS 117 (real name: Hubert Bonisseur de la Bath) first saw print in 1949, four years before Bond, and eventually figured in 265 novels. The French secret agent appeared in seven movies between 1956 and 1970, incarnated by a variety of actors including Ivan Desny, Kerwin Mathews and Frederick Stafford.

Pre-credits seg in 1945 Berlin shows OSS 117 outsmarting the Nazis, rescuing documents crucial to the Allies and taking a propeller plane out of a nosedive without breaking a sweat or forgetting to make a lame pun or two.

Ten years later, in Rome, OSS 117 appears to have a way with exotic foreign beauties, but may be just as enamored of his tux. Pic’s delectable tone of straight-faced parody — a calculated departure from the original novels’ straightforward seriousness — never falters.

After a fellow agent, Jack Jefferson (Philippe Lefebvre), is murdered, Hubert is ordered to take his place at the head of a poultry firm in Cairo. This is to be his cover while he investigates Jack’s death, monitors the Suez Canal, checks up on the Brits and Soviets, burnishes France’s reputation, quells a fundamentalist rebellion and brokers peace in the Middle East.

“No problem,” replies Hubert, whose suave self-importance is topped only by his phenomenal ignorance and dumb luck.

Deplaning at Cairo airport with a bevy of stewardesses hanging on his every utterance, Hubert is met by fetching and brainy secretary Larmina El Akmar Betouche (Berenice Bejo). During a suitably rear-projection drive into town, Hubert marvels at how much sand there is in Egypt and pooh-poohs Larmina’s assertion that “millions of people” speak Arabic.

What’s fun about the reinvented character is his arrogance. If Hubert hasn’t heard of something — like Islam, or the early-morning call to prayer — he dismisses it as some silly notion that’ll never catch on. “You’re so, so French!” exclaims the exasperated Larmina.

Hubert’s condescension toward the locals, his assumption that he’s irresistible to women and his abject lack of intuition make him a well-groomed accident waiting to happen. However, to its credit, narrative is not merely an excuse for set pieces and gags. From its re-visiting of ’60s-style hand-to-hand combat to the double cross-festooned finale, screenplay pays off in the manner of all self-respecting thrillers in which the bad guys appear to triumph.

Dujardin, a versatile thesp who made his breakthrough as Brice in comedy “Brice de Nice,” is enormously entertaining, and could carry a franchise if this pic clicks. Bejo is terrific as his curvaceous and long-suffering assistant.

Score is a consistent delight, and a Houdini-esque underwater escape is lensed with panache.

February 22nd, 2010 at 11:18 am | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

A close car confidence man gets locked inside a high-tech Porsche and its perverse P subjects him to various forms of torture by way of remote control. Who will win, fetters or machine?

February 19th, 2010 at 9:53 pm | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink


Studio:

Paramount Pictures


Length:

93 Minutes


Rating:

PG-13 for crude and sexual humor, language, a comic violent image and some drug references.


Theatrical Release:

March 30, 2007


Directed by:

Josh Gordon & Will Speck


Written by:

Jeff Cox & Craig Cox & Busy Phillipps & John Altschuler & Dave Krinsky.


Cast:



Will Ferrell

- Chazz Michael Michaels


Jon Heder

- Jimmy MacElroy


Will Arnett

- Stranz Van Waldenberg


Amy Poehler

- Fairchild Van Waldenberg


Jenna Fischer

- Katie Van Waldenberg


William Fichtner

- Darren MacElroy

Blades of Glory (2007)


Drop-kick some ice.

March 30, 2007

Decline:

B+ (Fresh)


The Will Ferrell Movie has really become a genre of its own. Most people seem to either love or hate the guy, dating all the way back to his early

Saturday Night Live

career. He plays abrasive, often vulgar characters and would appear at first glance to be as one-note as they come. Then he goes and makes a movie like

Stranger than Fiction

, where he is genuinely likable. As a moderate fan of his dramatic work and a toss-up fan of his comedic offerings, I entered

Blades of Glory

with the utmost of cautious optimism.

Little did I know I was about to see what has to be in the top three funniest Ferrell films to date. Granted, mocking figure skating can be done by just about anyone, but there is a refreshing zaniness to be found in nearly every scene. Instead of just trying to be gross, as so many comedies resort to,

Blades of Glory

actually knows comedy and when a situation has been stretched for all it?s worth. Fortunately there is a scene of equal or greater comedy on deck.

In the film Ferrell is Chazz Michael Michaels, a sex-a-holic figure skater who is bitter enemies with rival Jimmy MacElroy (Heder), a pretty boy whose life is run by his overbearing father, Darren (Fichtner). After a brawl breaks out over a result that forces Chazz and Jimmy to split a gold medal, both are stripped of their winnings and banned from the sport forever ? or so they think. Turns out a loophole exists and Chazz and Jimmy can get back in the game, provided they are partners. With the help of

Jimmy?s old coach, Coach (Craig T. Nelson ? how appropriate), the two begin their training for a showdown with their new rivals, Stranz (Arnett) and Fairchild (Poehler) Van Waldenberg.

As is a necessity while parodying anything involving figure skating, the cheese level is appropriately high. Directors Josh Gordon and Will Speck know we?re laughing at the awful composite and wire work, which gives the illusion of Ferrell and Heder actually skating, so they run with it. The final sequence, involving Chazz and Jimmy pulling off what is considered to be an impossible move (as is demonstrated by a laughably gruesome video of another pair?s failed attempt), is pure gold.

Ferrell steals the show, playing his patented jerk manly man with plenty of quotable lines. Those expecting Ferrell to actually pass up an opportunity to take off his clothes would be best advised to just keep on waiting. Heder makes for a serviceable sidekick, but he still comes across as

Napoleon Dynamite

with a different wig. The supporting work by Craig T. Nelson is a fantastic mix of his old

Coach

days updated accordingly with a rudeness that occasionally catches you off-guard. What a team.



Blades of Glory

is by no means groundbreaking and can?t resist the temptation to go for the obvious gag on several occasions, but it is nevertheless the funniest movie so far this year. In an era of unspeakably awful spoofs and unimaginative turd humor,

Blades of Glory

?s energy and spontaneity is a welcome sight.

February 17th, 2010 at 9:03 am | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink